Mr Heald’s GCSE English Online

February 26, 2007

IMPORTANT: Warning about plagiarism

Filed under: Uncategorized — McAuley English @ 12:45 am

After a long evening’s marking & preparation, it is with a rather heavy heart that I feel the need to make this posting. Early in the course I warned about the seriousness of plagiarism (using the words or ideas of someone else without acknowledgement). The exam boards are becoming increasingly concerned about plagiarism, especially in coursework, and are making increasingly strenuous efforts to catch and penalise those involved. I have given repeated warnings about this. When you submit your coursework folder you will have to complete the following part of your candidate record form:

Sources of advice and information

3. Have you received any help or information from anyone other than your subject teacher(s)
in the production of this work? (Write YES or NO)

4. If you have answered YES, give details below. Continue on a separate sheet if necessary.

5. If you have used any books, information leaflets or other materials (e.g. videos, software packages or
information from the Internet) to help you complete this work, you must list these below, unless they are
clearly acknowledged in the work itself. To present material copied from books or other sources without
acknowledgement will be regarded as deliberate deception.

NOTICE TO CANDIDATE
The work you submit for assessment must be your own.
If you copy from someone else or allow another candidate to copy from you, or if you
cheat in any other way, you may be disqualified from at least the subject concerned.

6. Declaration by candidate
I have read and understood the Notice to Candidate (above). I have produced the attached work without
assistance other than that which is acceptable under the scheme of assessment.

In previous years I have found examples of plagiarism, and in some cases (at A level, as it happens) it has been too late for the candidate to submit work that meets the criteria, resulting in the candidates either losing the marks for that element, or even withdrawing from the subject completely. If you commit plagiarism (ie. cheat) without your teacher detecting it before it is submitted, there is still a chance that it will be detected by the exam boards as they are using increasingly sophisticated techniques to identify suspicious work. This could result in you being disqualified, possibly from ALL subjects set by that exam board.

Incidentally, most of the work that exhibits plagiarism would not be rewarded very highly anyway, as it usually does not address the specific task set adequately.

If you are in any doubt at all as to whether your work might infringe the regulations, please draw any potential issues to my attention straight away. It is much better to be safe than sorry. The joint body that represents the exam boards has issued a lot of guidance on plagiarism and how to detect it for teachers, and how to avoid it for students. I have reproduced part of their guidance below. Read it, absorb it, make use of it, and if there is anything you are unsure about, please ask.

Guidance on referencing
A useful guide to referencing can be found on line at

http://www.jiscpas.ac.uk/apppage.cgi?USERPAGE=6320

(a) A reference in the text, or as a footnote, should show at least the name of the
author, the year of publication and the page number: For example: (Morrison,
2000, pg.29.)

(b) Candidates must also include a bibliography at the end of their work, which lists
details of publications that have been used to research their project. For example:
Morrison, A. (2000) “Mary, Queen of Scots”, London: Weston Press.

(c) For material taken from web pages, the reference must show the precise web
page, not the search engine used to locate it. This can be copied from the address
line. For example:
(http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/16/sosteacher/history/49766.shtml)

(d) For individual works found through the internet, the reference should show the
details as in (b), above, plus the URL and the date accessed. For example:
Airey, C. (2004). The State of Play Today [Online] 6th Edition. Available:
http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/republic.html [20th September 2001].

February 23, 2007

Gulliver’s Travels

Filed under: Pre-1914 Prose — McAuley English @ 10:43 pm

I have added a few more links to the Pre-1914 prose page, including one to an excellent short online course.

I very strongly recommend you all in year 11 to work your way through this. Depending on your speed of reading, and how long you take over the quizzes or any note-taking, you could work through this in as little as half an hour; certainly it shouldn’t take more than about an hour, and you’ll be able to tell people you have completed a university course (sort of). You are required to register your address and email details as it is a course provided by the University of Washington, and they need to be able to track the use of their courses. They have a strict privacy policy so your details will not be passed on to anyone else; it is quite safe.

The course is particularly useful for filling in some of the details of the historical, political, social and religious background to the story, which I am able to touch on only briefly in class.

The course can be found here

February 22, 2007

Film Language

Filed under: Media — McAuley English @ 2:32 pm

If you want to find out more about how different aspects of film language are typically used by directors to create different meanings & effects, there is an excellent website here with stills and video clips to illustrate the techniques, accompanied by commentary on their use and significance.

February 8, 2007

Inside-Out

Filed under: Uncategorized — McAuley English @ 8:59 pm

If anyone wants to chuck in any comments on this one, here’s the place to do it.

Girl Chewing Gum

Filed under: Uncategorized — McAuley English @ 8:58 pm

I was asked by someone earlier to put a couple of extra blog entries in to separate discussion of the films. The comments sections below are getting a bit unwieldy, so that’s maybe not a bad idea.

There are one or two interesting bits online about this film and its director, John Smith, if you’re interested in doing a search.

February 2, 2007

About A Girl

Filed under: Uncategorized — McAuley English @ 10:38 am

What are your thoughts about this short film? Take a look back at the notes you wrote in class, think about the class discussion that followed, and post your ideas or questions in the comments section.

February 1, 2007

Glosoli video

Filed under: Uncategorized — McAuley English @ 2:45 pm

The video for Glosoli by Sigur Ros can be streamed or downloaded in a variety of formats from the official website here.

Alternatively you can download the whole video direct from here.

Music videos (other than full-length DVD’s seem to be reviewed rather rarely). One website devoted to such reviews is here but the reviews are very brief, and often seem to be aimed at a very specialised audience of readers who are already very familiar with music videos.

To be successful it is important that a review has a clear sense of audience and purpose, and fits the format of the publication concerned. To gain practice in review writing, making use of some of the technical vocabulary you have been learning, I would like you to write a review of the Glosoli video for readers of this blog, and add it in the comments section. You should aim to write between 250 and 500 words to analyse the video, review its content and meaning, and comment on your view of its effectiveness (or otherwise).

Educating Rita

Filed under: Uncategorized — McAuley English @ 12:38 pm

As promised, I am putting up some resources for the Post-1914 drama assignment on Educating Rita. They will be added to the Post-1914 Drama page: the link is over on the sidebar to the right.

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.